mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981162

commit 5289966ea576a062b80319975b31b661c196ff9d upstream.

This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it
currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and
decides according to that.

Artem Bityutskiy: the options were moved in
a40f734 mtd: nand: consolidate redundant flash-based BBT flags

Artem Bityutskiy: CCing -stable

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Leann Ogasawara <leann.ogasawara@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
index 493ec2f..f39f83e 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
@@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static int gpmi_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
                chip->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1);
 
        /* Do we have a flash based bad block table ? */
-       if (chip->options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
+       if (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
                ret = nand_update_bbt(mtd, ofs);
        else {
                chipnr = (int)(ofs >> chip->chip_shift);