From c2f7317c8ed8f8bd6bd20bee59d643a0d7fdbedb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:17:11 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package v2 BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981162 commit 2815ab92ba3ab27556212cc306288dc95692824b upstream. On Intel CPUs the processor typically uses the highest frequency set by any logical CPU. When the system overheats Linux first forces the frequency to the lowest available one to lower the temperature. However this was done only per logical CPU, which means all logical CPUs in a package would need to go through this before the frequency is actually lowered. Worse this delay actually prevents real throttling, because the real throttle code only proceeds when the lowest frequency is already reached. So when a throttle event happens force the lowest frequency for all CPUs in the package where it happened. The per CPU state is now kept per package, not per logical CPU. An alternative would be to do it per cpufreq unit, but since we want to bring down the temperature of the complete chip it's better to do it for all. In principle it may even make sense to do it for all CPUs, but I kept it on the package for now. With this change the frequency is actually lowered, which in terms also allows real throttling to proceed. I also removed an unnecessary per cpu variable initialization. v2: Fix package mapping Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Len Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Leann Ogasawara Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner --- drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c index 870550d..4da7d9d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c @@ -58,6 +58,27 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_thermal"); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg); static unsigned int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0; +#define reduction_pctg(cpu) \ + per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, phys_package_first_cpu(cpu)) + +/* + * Emulate "per package data" using per cpu data (which should really be + * provided elsewhere) + * + * Note we can lose a CPU on cpu hotunplug, in this case we forget the state + * temporarily. Fortunately that's not a big issue here (I hope) + */ +static int phys_package_first_cpu(int cpu) +{ + int i; + int id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu); + + for_each_online_cpu(i) + if (topology_physical_package_id(i) == id) + return i; + return 0; +} + static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy policy; @@ -77,7 +98,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, max_freq = ( policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * - (100 - per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, policy->cpu) * 20) + (100 - reduction_pctg(policy->cpu) * 20) ) / 100; cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); @@ -103,16 +124,28 @@ static int cpufreq_get_cur_state(unsigned int cpu) if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu)) return 0; - return per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, cpu); + return reduction_pctg(cpu); } static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state) { + int i; + if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu)) return 0; - per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, cpu) = state; - cpufreq_update_policy(cpu); + reduction_pctg(cpu) = state; + + /* + * Update all the CPUs in the same package because they all + * contribute to the temperature and often share the same + * frequency. + */ + for_each_online_cpu(i) { + if (topology_physical_package_id(i) == + topology_physical_package_id(cpu)) + cpufreq_update_policy(i); + } return 0; } @@ -120,10 +153,6 @@ void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) - if (cpu_present(i)) - per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, i) = 0; - i = cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); if (!i) -- 1.7.10.4