nohz: Fix stale jiffies update in tick_nohz_restart()
authorNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:09:37 +0000 (15:09 -0400)
committerLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:15:07 +0000 (19:15 +0100)
commitf7b981111fbcd3ddf38f2d0042e05525803d12de
tree5b2356051a2afe73945958315e6c17c64c9c2889
parent4aacb7b7cbacb09d23e955bcdc5585062b508305
nohz: Fix stale jiffies update in tick_nohz_restart()

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987337

commit 6f103929f8979d2638e58d7f7fda0beefcb8ee7e upstream.

Fix tick_nohz_restart() to not use a stale ktime_t "now" value when
calling tick_do_update_jiffies64(now).

If we reach this point in the loop it means that we crossed a tick
boundary since we grabbed the "now" timestamp, so at this point "now"
refers to a time in the old jiffy, so using the old value for "now" is
incorrect, and is likely to give us a stale jiffies value.

In particular, the first time through the loop the
tick_do_update_jiffies64(now) call is always a no-op, since the
caller, tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(), will have already called
tick_do_update_jiffies64(now) with that "now" value.

Note that tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() already uses the correct
approach: when we notice we cross a jiffy boundary, grab a new
timestamp with ktime_get(), and *then* update jiffies.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1332875377-23014-1-git-send-email-ncardwell@google.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
kernel/time/tick-sched.c